Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news
Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is set in its place.
Stacy, a tenant in the duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not offered her more than enough notice before raising her rent, citing a whole new state law that demands a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will acquire care of the many areas of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Although there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds small sway. Still, if there is not any precedent within the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could be regarded as because of the court.
Within the United States, folks are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember 1 rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only into the case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or Lady do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they will Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority get more info has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely proven now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if content that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his very own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service towards the Federation/ province inside the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.